Tell a friend:
 

13th Feburary 2010
Opposition Politics And Taiwan...

I have followed with more than passing interest the attitude of various political parties in the Organization of East Caribbean States (O. E. C. S.) - Saint Lucia included - in their relations with second countries particularly China and Taiwan. Last week the sale of ‘defensive’ weapons to Taiwan by the USA - a move which greatly angered mainland China - must have forced many to review the Taiwan/China issue. Some in the region have long suggested common and joint diplomatic representation by govern-ments (and political parties) in the move toward greater economic union and integration within the region. No one in these islands any longer denies the connection between diplomatic relations, investments and economic progress.
It is from such a political/economic perspective one wishes to examine the role of Saint Lucia’s opposition as it charts a way forward.
A brief history of the island’s external relations since independence in 1979 may therefore be noteworthy, at this time. At independence, (Feb. 1979) Saint Lucia established diplomatic relations with Taiwan. When the opposition St. Lucia Labour party took office in June of that year, it continued friendly relations with Taiwan. There was never any initiative as far as one recalls for the Labour government at the time, to recognize communist China over Taiwan. After the short-lived Labour government, the new Compton government continued where it left off and further consolidated this island’s friendly relations with Taiwan.
However, when the former Minister of Foreign Affairs in the Labour government of 1979-1982 was appointed Ambassador to the United Nations in New York by Prime Minister Compton in the mid-eighties, that particular Diplomat and former Foreign Minister did all in his power to woo and befriend countries such as Lybia, China, Iran, the USSR. The Compton regime had earlier established diplomatic relations with Cuba - a Caribbean country and friendly neighbour.
Fifteen years later, (1997), when the St. Lucia Labour party regained office, Compton’s former UN diplomat had by then returned to labour and used his tremendous influence (and China’s growing clout) to get the new Labour Cabinet to sever diplomatic relations with Taiwan and to side with communist China. Reports suggest that many in cabinet then were angered and displeased by the underhand manner the change took place. Some there even recalled that at public political meetings leading to the 1997 general elections that, the man disclosed how much Taiwan had offered to invest on the island if Labour got into office. But he was careful never to divulge how much communist China offered to spend and whether anyone got any personal handshakes for facilitating the transfer of relations from Taiwan to China. Following the elections of 1997, the trusted, steady, reliable and democratic Taiwan was unceremoniously shown the exit door by new Labour. Unfortunately, it was an old labour that had done the dirty work.
This little history lesson aside, perhaps it is now opportune to remind those who need reminding that ‘Diplomacy is about a country’s self-interest’. It’s certainly not about well placed individuals pocketing huge personal gifts to facilitate recognition of any particular country, at the expense of the broader masses. Therefore, before any review and debate of this island’s foreign policy, people must be invited to recognize the difference between civil behaviour toward a foreign government and its representatives on one hand and out-and-out hostility and ill manners towards bona fide diplomats on the other. In the practice of its International Relations, this country should always emphasize civility and internationally acceptable conduct from its politicians and citizens towards representatives of countries living and working on the island. When serious disagreements arise between countries, there are international rules for dealing with such problems.
We must now zoom-in more closely and specifically examine the unilaterally directed ‘war of words’ from the opposition towards Taiwan and its representative here.

 
 

First off, it must be observed that DR. May have been hoodwinked by his former colleague into recognizing Communist China. It must also be said here that there is nothing permanent in politics and the leader of the opposition is aware of that. Perhaps this is the reason he has ceased attacking Taiwan, the country, and now focuses his attacks on Ambassador Chou instead. But sparing the country and attacking its ambassador is really six of one and half a dozen of the other.
Besides, every opposition politician worth his or her salt knows that the attacks on the Taiwanese representative is both unwarranted and in bad taste, and is also bad politics. Instead, the opposition would be well advised to do one of three things. First, it ought to give each constituency leader a choice to establish contacts with the Taiwan ambassador for the sake of his/her constituents, as each sees fit. Secondly, it can persuade its leader to make a tactical retreat and let someone else begin talks with Ambassador Chou aimed at normalizing relations with the ambassador, if not his country. Thirdly, it can impress its friends in Communist China to match the expenditure in projects the Taiwan government is spending here to develop this island’s rural communities. It seems unfair to punish innocent people who know nothing about Taiwan or China and even less of the reason they are allowed to suffer whilst their neighbours are allowed to benefit from Taiwanese help. It would be an even greater disgrace if China’s money were to be used only for electioneering and personal enrichment.
Notwithstanding any legitimate differences the opposition may have with the Taiwanese representative here, a call for his removal does not seem to be as politically useful to the opposition at this time as some sensible diplomatic formula for civil conduct even if they foolishly continued to refuse offers of assistance to their various constituencies.
Relations with Taiwan can be a win-win situation if handled properly by the opposition. An enlightened politician does not have to go cap in hand or become subservient to any foreign diplomat in seeking ways and means to help those who voted him into parliament. When the body is sick, it does not matter which doctor prescribed medication or from which pharmacy the medicine came. With the opposition always gloating about the parlous state of the national economy, it seems an even greater shame they should allow their constituencies to suffer for lack of needed assistance which the government of Taiwan is willing to provide. The U. W. P in opposition would never have behaved so childishly and stupidly toward communist China in seeking help for their people. That summarizes the whole difference between the two political parties. Finally, the recent US fifteen plus billion dollar arms sales to Taiwan should underline the financial viability of that country and also signal to one and all one more reason to rethink their position on Taiwan and the achievements of the Taiwanese people.


Discuss Story

 
Top Stories  
 
 
     
 
   
Developed