Needed:
an environmental performance incentive for Caribbean electric
utilities
By Herbert
A Samuel
The
facts about greenhouse gas emissions implicate the power sector
in a large part of the problem of climate change: the global
power sector is the largest single emitter of carbon dioxide,
the most important of the human-influenced greenhouse gases.
For the Caribbean region, the situation is the same.
General consensus has been reached on the need to reduce greenhouse
gas emissions, so the spotlight must shine on power companies.
The question is: how do we tackle the problem?
Increased use of renewables by power utilities is one option,
and many Caribbean utilities are now looking at renewables
but overall, the move towards renewables has been slow. For
example: most of the Caribbean power companies looking at
wind energy (the most popular of the renewable options) are
at the resource assessment, pre-feasibility or feasibility
study stage, so no wind energy will be generated at any of
these companies for another several (3 to 5) years. Some exceptions
exist: in Curacao, the electricity company has been operating
wind farms since 1993 (yes, for the past 15 years!) and has
been steadily expanding their wind power capacity. In Jamaica,
the Petroleum Corporation of Jamaica (yes, an oil company!)
has since 2004 operated a 21 MW wind farm that provides renewable
energy to the electricity company for distribution to customers;
they too are looking at expansion.
But in the intervening years until other utilities get wind
and other renewables up and running, their carbon emissions
will continue to increase as demand for electricity grows.
So here’s a suggestion for an incentive to encourage
– and hopefully accelerate – the move towards
renewables.
First,
Caribbean power companies should be required to adopt a new
performance indicator, to be added to the existing list of
financial, operational and other indicators: something in
the format of pounds of carbon dioxide equivalent per kilowatt-hour
(unit) sold. Whatever the final form, the aim of the indicator
should be to factor in the effects of the utility’s
fuel conversion efficiency; its technical and non-technical
losses; own use; purchased power and renewables contribution.
Second (and here’s where the incentive comes in), financiers
of power projects should require power companies to report
on this indicator and should adjust interest rates on their
loans to power companies accordingly – the higher the
borrower’s carbon equivalent emissions per unit sales,
the higher the interest rate on their loan.
Governments and regulators should (at the very least) encourage
commercial banks to adopt this approach, to ensure that those
utilities that have the option to access private sector financing
for large projects are covered. In related news, it is encouraging
to note that a group of leading Wall Street banks, in consultation
with progressive US power companies has just announced the
creation of the “carbon principles”, which seek
to create an institutional approach to evaluating and addressing
carbon risks in the financing of electric power projects.
The above-proposed incentive essentially translates general
principles (such as are espoused in the US banks’ carbon
principles) into a specific, measurable result. The details
of the proposed incentive would need to be worked out collectively
among the governments, owners, utilities and financiers in
the Caribbean - but now is the time to start the discussion.
After all, another five years worth of increasing carbon emissions
is more than enough.
|