The
Gift of Division
For weeks,
the debate had persisted; the subject had been on everyone’s
lips and on the country’s collective mind, gaining intensity
as time went by.
Finally, this past Tuesday, during his budget presentation,
the Foreign Affairs Minister dropped the bomb … clearing
the air and putting an end to all the speculation.
St. Lucia will establish full diplomatic relations with Taiwan.
At the risk of appearing redundant – but just in case
there could still be even one of our readers who does not
have a full grasp of the situation – we point out that
originally, Taiwan was a part of the country of China, that
took a decision to break away and declare its independence,
establishing itself as a sovereign state, autonomous and separate
from “mainland” China.
In effect, one country was fragmented into two.
More importantly, one people was fragmented into two.
The deep division that exists between those one-time fellow-countrymen
follows them wherever they go, manifesting itself in every
corner of the world and influencing the policies of other
countries … the extent of the influence being dependent
on the extent to which each country feels the need to accept
(mainly financial) help from one or the other of the two protagonists.
The United States for example, will hardly feel the effects
of the rivalry between Taiwan and China, while a poor, struggling
country may find itself in a position where it must dance
to the tune that the piper – whether it has chosen that
that piper be Chinese or Taiwanese – plays.
In the real world, it is inescapable that countries as poor
as ours look to survive by accepting handouts from larger,
richer “friends” in exchange for favours. Under
normal circumstances, there is no dishonour, no shame, in
seeking, making and maintaining alliances with those who help
a country and its people develop and sustain a decent standard
of living.
There are few “rich” countries and innumerable
poor ones.
One very important aspect however, of this entire China/Taiwan
scenario that is being played out in St. Lucia at this time,
that is perhaps being overlooked, is that we do not allow
the divisiveness that exists between these two one-time brothers
to transfer itself to our people and cause us to take sides,
in a way that would create as deep a rift between us, as seems
to exist between them.
We are – and have always been – one people. As
a result of the “occupation” of at-one-time one
and at-one-time the other of these strangers, one can already
almost feel the country being divided between the SLP/China
and the UWP/Taiwan factions.
Our country is no stranger to differing points of view: for
ages, we have been either Catholic or Protestant; La Rose
or La Marguerite; Flambeau or Labour; pro-life or pro-abortion
… and the list goes on.
But underneath it all, we have always remained fiercely St.
Lucian, proud to be identified as such; and whether we come
from Laborie or Gros Islet, Tet Chemin or Bouton, the Pitons,
Pigeon Island and the Sulphur Springs belong to us all …
and whether we are white, mulatto, Indian, black or shabine,
we remain – and we make no bones about it – St.
Lucian.
We have here, within our shores at this time, a people who
were once brothers, living together as unified as blood, heritage
and common ancestry can make possible, who now insist that
were you to associate with one side, it would be inconceivable
that you have any dealings with the other.
A people divided into factions that can no longer coexist
with each other.
Whatever material things they give to us in exchange for our
allegiance, we accept; it is a pragmatism we live with, because
of our situation on the world stage and our level in the international
pecking order.
We must however, beware of also letting them give to us that
element of divisiveness that follows them around, that seems
to want to transfer itself into our affairs … and that
could split us apart, taking away one of the things that is
so important to us as a nation:
Our sense of unity.

|